SOMA
Demo
The Daily
Field Notes 5 min read

Why do CEOs trust net zero by 2050 more than their own staff do?

New research finds UK business leaders far more confident than frontline employees that their organisations will meet the 2050 net zero target, exposing an awareness divide inside companies.

By The SOMA Desk 2026-10-15
Why do CEOs trust net zero by 2050 more than their own staff do?
Why do CEOs trust net zero by 2050 more than their own staff do?

UK business leaders are far more confident than frontline employees that their organisations will meet the 2050 net zero target, according to new research reported by edie. The research also reveals a divide in awareness of corporate sustainability plans. In plain terms, the people setting targets and the people carrying out daily work do not share the same picture of whether those targets are achievable.

The gap matters because emissions reductions are delivered operationally. Targets set in the boardroom depend on procurement choices, facility management, logistics decisions and supplier conversations made by staff far from the executive floor. If those employees are unaware of the plan, or doubtful about it, delivery risk rises regardless of how ambitious the headline commitment is.

For sustainability consultants and in house ESG managers, the finding points to an internal communication task that sits alongside external reporting. A transition plan that is disclosed under ESRS E1 but poorly understood inside the organisation is vulnerable at the implementation stage. Teams may want to test how well employees in operations and purchasing can describe the targets and their own role in meeting them.

Procurement leads face a specific version of this problem. Scope 3 reductions depend on buyers asking the right questions of suppliers and acting on the answers. Where purchasing staff are not briefed on the plan, supplier engagement tends to be inconsistent, and the data that comes back is harder to compare or verify.

The research is a useful reminder that confidence at the top is not evidence of progress. Companies preparing CSRD disclosures should treat employee awareness as a leading indicator of delivery capacity. Closing the gap is cheaper than explaining a missed target later, and it gives auditors a more credible story about governance of the transition.

Read more →

Share this story

Keep reading.

All stories